Monday, December 5, 2011

Are you concerned about Canada's growing income gap?

The gap in earnings between rich and poor in Canada is the widest it's been in 30 years, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development says.

In a report released Monday, the OECD said the average income of the richest 10 per cent in its 34 member nations is nine times the average income of the poorest 10 per cent. That 9-to-1 ratio is the largest gap in a generation, the agency says.

The gap in Canada is even wider: 10 to 1. The average income of the top 10 per cent of Canadians in 2008 was $103,500 -- 10 times higher than that of the lowest 10 per cent, who earned an average of $10,260. The ratio was 8 to 1 in the early 1990s.

The gap is also 10 to 1 in Italy, Japan, Korea and the United Kingdom. In Israel, Turkey and the United States, it's 14 to 1.



Wealth gap widens to 30-year high



Economic Emotion: How do you feel about the economy?

Cautious? Anxious? Helpless? Secure? Optimistic?

How you feel about the state of the economy?




Remember When Canada Was an Environmental Leader?

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/tzeporah-berman/canada-kyoto-protocol_b_1120793.html?ref=canada-politics&ref=canada

Canada Slammed At Durban Climate Talks


TWITTER REACTS TO NEWS CANADA MAY WITHDRAW FROM KYOTO:

Elizabeth May MP

Outrageous news of Canada's sneaky plan to pull out of Kyoto after Durban talks (Dec 23 so ppl will be busy with families) hits Durban COP.

Make Poverty History Canada

http://www.facebook.com/makepovertyhistorycanada


Canada Income Inequality: Which Provinces Have The Widest Income Gap?

When it comes to the income inequality, Canada's provinces are, well, unequal.




OECD report finds income inequality rising in Canada




Saturday, December 3, 2011

BioWar: Elite develop genetically engineered weapons to eliminate ethnic groups

Admitted government projects relating to genetically engineered weapons that could be used to eliminate entire ethnic groups.





Related articles:

  1. Concerns Are Raised About Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes
  2. Genetically engineered salmon under FDA consideration
  3. FDA nears approval of genetically engineered salmon
  4. NYPD spy unit found to be targeting ethnic groups
  5. A New Breed of Genetically Engineered Vaccines Will Take Control of Our DNA and Minds
  6. Genetically engineered Merck Cancer Vaccine Made Mandatory For Immigrants
  7. State Dept. Aggressively Pushed Genetically-Modified Crops to Help Agribusiness Giants
  8. Bolshevik Revolution Was Engineered by Freemasons, Financed by Banking Elite
  9. Genetically modified maize lowers fertility in mice, study finds
  10. Glowing proteins genetically engineered from jellyfish win Nobel Prize
  11. Mutant mosquitoes: Malaysia release of genetically modified insects sparks fears of uncontrollable new species
  12. Now Bernanke Wants To Eliminate Reserve Requirements Completely


Canada May Miss $6.7 Billion Carbon Offset Bill by Exiting Kyoto Protocol

Bloomberg
December 3, 2011

Canada, the country furthest from meeting its commitment to cut carbon emissions under the Kyoto Protocol, may save as much as $6.7 billion by exiting the global climate change agreement and not paying for offset credits.

The country’s greenhouse-gas emissions are almost a third higher than 1990 levels, and it has a 6 percent CO2 reduction target for the end of 2012. If it couldn’t meet its goal, Canada would have to buy carbon credits, under the rules of the legally binding treaty.

Canada, which has the world’s third-largest proven oil reserves, would be the first of 191 signatories to the Kyoto Protocol to annul its emission-reduction obligations. While Environment Minister Peter Kent declined to confirm Nov. 28 that Canada is preparing to pull out of Kyoto, which may ease the burden for oil-sands producers and coal-burning utilities, he said the government wouldn’t make further commitments to it.

[...]

Canadian delegates, including Kent, are in Durban, South Africa for United Nations climate talks. Negotiators are struggling to agree to a successor to Kyoto, which expires at the end of 2012 and is also opposed by Japan and Russia.


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-02/canada-may-escape-6-7-billion-bill-by-exiting-kyoto-protocol.html



U.S.-Canadian Border Deal to Streamline GMO Approval: Confirmed

Canada-U.S. Regulatory Co-operation Council under border deal coverage would put Canada under draconian Food Safety Modernization Act, fast track GMO approval.

Our report sounding the alarm that Obama and Harper’s secretive border deal, due to be signed next week, would be used to fast track GMO acceptance has been confirmed. The details have been kept under wraps, but recent reports revealed that the ‘Beyond Borders’ security and law enforcement deal would also seek to ‘harmonize’ U.S. and Canadian regulatory standards for food, auto and other trade sectors.

The Globe and Mail confirms that the North American Union security perimeter initiative, sold to the public as new security measures at the border, has a second major component– the Canada-U.S. Regulatory Co-operation Council.

Mr. Harper… said there are two issues on the joint security and economic agenda of the two countries. One, he said, is the border and perimeter initiative, and the other is Canada-U.S. Regulatory Co-operation Council.

“We are seeking ways of ensuring security in North America while at the same time making sure that we continue strong Canadian access to the American market,” Mr. Harper told reporters.

This will encompass far more than just the terms under which food can cross the border– it will put approval for biotechnology on a fast track in both countries and impose FDA and other regulations on both countries.

The agenda of the Canada-U.S. Regulatory Co-operation Council was quietly announced in February 2011, putting explicit focus on the implementation of theU.S. Food Safety Modernization Act requirements under the larger Perimeter Security and Economic Competitiveness agenda. That nightmarish legislation was heavily criticized for new authority it grants the U.S. government over the right to grow, trade and transport foods of any kind.

In other words, it is poised to boost the reach of Big Agra and biotech firms at the expense of small farmers and ordinary people.

Now, under the new Obama-Harper deal, Canada, too, would accept this tyranny over food.

Specifically, the Canada-U.S. Regulatory Cooperative Council (under “free” trade) would establish a joint review process for pre-market GMO approval, establish a policy for the acceptance and export of LLPs (Low-Level Presence contamination of genetically modified foods bans in country of export) and recommends eliminating mandatory country of origin labeling, and more.

From the report:

Biotechnology

Establish a joint review process or a Mutual Recognition Agreement for biotechnology product approvals to facilitate synchronized approvals.

Establish a common policy for dealing with low level presence (LLP) of unapproved biotechnology products (e.g., harmonized risk assessments and acceptance of LLP already commercially available in the other country).

A 2004 symposium on Canada-U.S. Regulatory Co-operation even recommends outright acceptance of U.S. food standards: The Health Products and Food Branch is now considering a risk-based approach to regulatory co-operation, which might entail accepting or referencing decisions made by the US Food and Drug Administration and other regulators for low-risk products.

With U.S. regulatory agencies filled with revolving door stooges like FDA Deputy Commissioner for Foods Michael R. Taylor, formerly a Vice President at Monsanto and long a go-between for biotech and government regulations, there is little doubt what direction such a “harmonization” of food regulations, including FDA recommendations, would mean under the ‘Beyond Borders’ deal.

President Obama and Prime Minister Stephen Harper are scheduled to meet one-on-one next Wednesday to discuss and sign the deal… then its details will finally be revealed to the world.

—-

Perimeter Security and Economic Competitiveness: Regulatory Cooperation – A Report on the Consultations on Regulatory Cooperation Between Canada and the United States

Read PDF here or web version here. Excerpt from p. 25

Appendix 2: Specific Proposals by Sector
Agriculture and Food
Food Safety Systems

Develop common approaches to food safety requirements and policies, aligning new regulations and guidance—specifically, implementation of the U.S. Food Safety Modernization Act requirements.

Mutually recognize food safety systems.

Improve the effectiveness of meat-safety-system equivalency agreements (i.e., eliminate or minimize re-inspections of product and microbial testing at the border).

Accept industry-led standards and programs that are based on international standards (e.g., the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point, or HACCP).

Harmonize approvals for food-safety-enhancing products and technology used in processing (e.g., packaging materials, anti-microbial interventions, testing methodologies and processes, sanitation, and maintenance chemicals and equipment).

Biotechnology

Establish a joint review process or a Mutual Recognition Agreement for biotechnology product approvals to facilitate synchronized approvals.

Establish a common policy for dealing with low level presence (LLP) of unapproved biotechnology products (e.g., harmonized risk assessments and acceptance of LLP already commercially available in the other country).
Agricultural Inputs

Building on significant collaboration to date, align pre-market approval processes and data requirements for crop protection products (i.e., pesticides, seed treatments) to facilitate joint reviews and assessments and improve re-evaluation and re-registration processes.

Resolve discrepancies in maximum residue limits for crop protection products.

Modify the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notice-of-arrival process to remove the advance notification requirement for products that are already EPA-registered.

Harmonize the approval process for veterinary drugs, including the establishment of maximum residue limits.

Labelling, Packaging and Product Content

Align nutritional labelling formats and content (e.g., nutrient definitions, required values, daily recommended intakes).

Harmonize approaches to allowed health claims.

Align standards for discretionary fortification of foods.

Develop uniform labelling requirements (e.g., quality specifications, method of production claims, glycemic index labelling).

Adopt a common approach to the nomenclature of meat cuts.

Eliminate or amend U.S. mandatory country-of-origin labelling requirements.

Align container size requirements (infant food, bottled and canned goods).

——-

RELATED: Secret U.S.-Canada Border Deal Hides GMO Takeover
RELATED: Canadian officials ‘secretive’ on North American perimeter security agreement



Friday, December 2, 2011

Canada is changing

Obnoxious Militarism Pervades Canadian Sports
Under this PM, the state is everywhere



'Harper Government' Not 'Government Of Canada': Why Did Tories Pursue 'Harperization'?



Durban fossil award from the 'uninformed': Kent



Memos Anticipate Religious Freedom Office Sensitivities


Communications lines drafted by the bureaucracy about the government's plan to establish an Office of Religious Freedom reveal a deep-seated nervousness about how the venture will be perceived by the public.


During the election campaign last spring the Conservatives promised the office would become a key pillar of Canadian foreign policy.

But documents obtained through access to information laws suggest the government is worried about the perception that the office would be used to curry favour with religious and ethnic groups in Canada. And it shows nervousness about the office being seen as an attempt to blur the line between church and state.


Who monitors our new religious freedom monitor?



Canada's Housing Market More Overvalued Than U.S. At Its Peak, The Economist Says



Canada Income Inequality: Living In Unequal Cities A Health Risk To Rich And Poor, Study Finds


Canada Wages Not Keeping Up With Inflation: Statscan


Friday, July 1, 2011

2011 Census

2011 Census — Important for Church Research


STATISTICS ACT



Information on the involvement of Lockheed Martin in the Canadian census



2011-01-13 The Rational Argument, Lockheed Martin in the Canadian census
http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=919

2011-02-11 Census Lockheed Martin, email to new head of StatsCan, Wayne Smith
http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=1362

2011-05-11 Census Lockheed Martin: On YouTube! Toronto Star coverage, Ottawa Citizen, Mother's Day Proclamation against (Lockheed Martin!) is 140 years old. WHY has it not succeeded?
http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=2449

Private Sector Involvement
What work is being contracted out for the 2011 Census?

Activities involving access to or handling of confidential census data are out of scope for contracting, and only undertaken by Statistics Canada employees. As a result, no contractor will ever have access to confidential census responses. Statistics Canada will contract out the provision of goods and services to the private sector, including the acquisition of software - Public Works and Government Services Canada awarded to Lockheed Martin Canada a contract to provide Statistics Canada software for its employees to process questionnaires in preparation for and during the 2011 Census.
http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2011/gen/private-sect-prive-eng.cfm




"Mr. Curtis," said the questioner at the U.S. House Judiciary Committee proceedings, "are there programs that can be used to secretly fix elections?"

And so begins the story of Clint Curtis - computer programmer, Floridian, Republican - who was asked by the company he worked for to create a vote-rigging software prototype that he assumed would be used to try and "catch" would-be fraudsters. It was a standard "opposition research" assignment - or so he was told. The truth, of course, was something completely different and weaves into a tangled web the 2000 Presidential Election debacle, a now-sitting U.S. Congressman, and the number one threat to our national security - electronic voting.

From Uncounted's "Whistleblowers Should Have Their Own Trading Cards. With Bubblegum" Series.

Canada Day

Canada Day 2011
http://gocanada.about.com/od/publicholidaysincanada/a/canada_day.htm

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Water for Life on Global TV BC



Global TV BC will air a one hour Water for Life concert special on June 25. Please tune in to support water and river conservation everywhere.

The Water for Life Benefit Concert took place on April 7, 2011, at the Michael J. Fox theatre in Burnaby. An evening of inspirational stories, music, and images from BC and around the world, it featured renowned conservationist Mark Angelo as well as musical guests Holly Arntzen and Kevin Wright. Proceeds raised from the event will go to the Nature Trust of BC and the African water relief efforts of WaterCan.

On my WordPress Blog

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

why do the Feds want the HST implemented so badly?

I read Bill Vander Zalm's "study" on FightHST.com, and got pissed off enough to write and edit a rebuttal video. Please forward this to your friends, and get everyone out to vote "No" on the referendum so we can keep the HST.


Former BC Premier Bill Vander Zalm's verbal attack on UBC student Chris Thompson's video





This is the sequel to FightFightHST - A Letter to Bill Vander Zalm. Chris Delaney and Bill Vander Zalm have been still misinforming people, and here we are again. Remember, voting NO means that we're keeping the HST, and that's what I'm obviously recommending.

And just for the record, the Liberals didn't pay me to do this. I'll say it again - the Liberals didn't pay me to do this, and I did this on my own, at home. I've received exactly two free meals because of these videos, along with the metric e-ton of hate-comments.

UBC student uses YouTube to skewer HST opponents

A 30-year-old UBC law student has entered the HST fray with a YouTube video countering arguments made by Fight HST.



HST: Why do the Feds want it so bad?


Friday, June 17, 2011

Smart Meters



Starting as soon as this summer the BC government is going to put a powerful wireless transmitter ON YOUR HOUSE. At a cost of One Billion Dollars. For no good reason.
We talk to Walt McGinnis about the dangers of all wireless technology -- including the ability of Hydro and other hackers to invade your privacy by reading your meter output -- which will be linked to ALL of your electrical devices -- and data mining your usage habits. This will allow Hydro to bill you based on peak or low times and it will allow marketers to target you based on your data.
They also discuss the intentional dismantling of BC Hydro, the lack of public consultation and education and, most important, the health impact of EMR on living organisms.




In this invitational presentation to the San Francisco Tesla Society consulting engineer Rob States explains how PG&E's so-called 'smart' meters work and why they endanger health and privacy. He asks the obvious question, "Why would you trust the company that brought you Prop. 16?"
For more info:
EMFSafetyNetwork.org StopSmartMeters.wordpress.com EON3EMFblog.net BioInitiative.org




KPFA radio commentators Layna Berman and Dr. Jeffry Fawcett of YourOwnHealthAndFitness.org lay out the case against PG&E's attempted mass installation of wireless so-called 'smart' meters throughout its service area. They debunk the bio-effects denialists who refuse to look at the massive scientific evidence showing that exposure to wireless radiation is hazardous. Their presentation of the technological, economic, biological and political context for the national 'smart grid' plan and the part 'smart' meters play in it is given visual emphasis with the live, simultaneous 'graphic recording' of cartoonist Brian Narelle of NarelleCreative.net. They lay out specific actions YOU can take to protect your home and neighborhood from PG&E's electro-smog assault on public health and democratic choice.

According to this report, "Smart meters" are safe



Saturday, June 11, 2011

In support of real solutions to homelessness



A funny look at a serious issue. As Vancouver gears up for the 2010 Winter Olympic Games, we look at the broken promises of VANOC and the IOC in regards to social housing. While some have made millions from the inflated property values, those on the fringe have been driven from their homes. We challenge VANOC and the IOC to make good on their promises and for the governments of Canada and BC to reinstitute the longstanding National Housing Plan.

We invite viewers to take part in the Hunger Strike Relay and the On to Ottawa Trek in support of real solutions to homelessness.

For more information go to 2010homelessness.ca

Poverty in Canada

http://intraspec.ca/povertyCanada_news-and-reports.php


A short animation about child poverty in Canada and British Columbia from First Call, a child and youth advocacy coalition based in Vancouver, Canada.

Created by Peter Romich of Diametric with music by James Andean.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Canada, Immigration, and Autism

Last week we told the story of 17-year-old Lewis Crowe. Because he has autism the Canadian Government has banned Lewis from living in Canada and in order to visit the country he needs special permission from the immigration department.

The Canadian Government regularly uses the excuse that allowing entry to families of children with special needs will cause financial burden on the health system. The question that needs to be asked is is it fair? Where do we draw the line?
If someone has severe allergies will they be denied access? What about someone who had cancer? or just a history minor infections?

In case you thought this may be the exception to the rule we bring you another story of a family who has been denied entry into Canada because their child has special needs.



U.S. Vs Marc Emery

CBC Newsworld's weekly documentary show The Lens launched its 2007 fall season with "Prince of Pot: The US vs. Marc Emery", director Nick Wilson's provocative, entertaining and hard-hitting documentary about Marc Emery's current extradition battle. "Prince of Pot" re-aired on January 22 and again on Tuesday, June 10th.
The DEA wants to have Marc Emery extradited to the United States to face life in prison. Is it about marijuana seeds, political dissidence, or national sovereignty? Should Marc Emery be extradited to America, or should he serve time in Canada -- and can Canadians do anything about it?



Saturday, May 7, 2011

Bandwidth limits are damaging to the economy

http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/blogs/geekingout/archive/2011/02/03/bandwidth-limits-are-damaging-to-the-economy.aspx

Putting caps on the internet might make sense if it had reached critical mass and people couldn't get things done, or if the companies providing it couldn't make a profit in doing so, but when was the last time you heard that Rogers, Bell, Shaw or Telus made a quarterly loss? Even in the hardest of economic times, they're making a very strong profit.

VIDEO: Big bandwidth users soon to pay more

Heavy internet users will soon be paying a higher monthly bill. Shaw is the latest internet provider to put a cap on internet usage and, as the CBC's Theresa Lalonde reports, if big downloaders go over, they will have to pay more.



Internet usage costs to rise

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2011/01/07/internet-expensive-surfing-canadians.html

Surfing and downloading from the internet is about to get more expensive for many Canadians as internet companies Shaw and Primus have announced plans to impose new fees and caps on internet usage.

Over the past year, the CRTC, Canada's communication regulator, let Bell and Rogers start charging extra for customers who download a lot of data. The growing demand for live-streaming and online movies gobbles up huge chunks of bandwidth on the World Wide Web.

Primus and Shaw have said they will begin passing on higher fees to their customers beginning Feb. 1. Primus, for example, rents bandwidth on Bell's networks and said Bell is inflating the costs for everyone, including them.

"It's an economic disincentive for internet use," said Matt Stein, vice-president of network services for Primus. "It's not meant to recover costs. In fact these charges that Bell has levied are many, many, many times what it costs to actually deliver it."

Hugh Thompson, who runs the website Digital Home, said he's been hearing growing consumer complaints.

He said more people say they are receiving bills of $5 to $10 a month in penalties — with some complaining their penalties are running as high as $100 — all for their use of iTunes, YouTube and Netflix.

"Their bandwidth has skyrocketed from maybe a gigabyte or two a month to some cases of 200 to 300 gigabytes per month," said Thompson.

"So now that people are using so much bandwidth, the companies are crying foul. They're saying: 'We can't make money off this. We need to charge more.'"

Currently, only a small percentage of users download enough data to hit these new caps. But many fear these fees will soon apply to everyone as the internet becomes more video based.

Extra billing for internet use

Extra billing for internet use a 'ripoff': NDP

The CRTC's decision to allow internet service providers to charge their customers for downloading excessive amounts of data threatens "free and open access to the internet in Canada," the NDP said Thursday.

Charlie Angus, the NDP's digital affairs critic, said the telecommunications regulator's decision to allow usage-based internet billing won't just affect the so-called bandwidth hogs but could hit many Canadians financially.

"We've seen this all before with cellphones," said Angus. "Allowing the internet service providers to ding you every time you download is a ripoff. Canada is already falling behind other countries in terms of choice, accessibility and pricing for the internet."

As the larger internet service providers are also broadcasters and content providers, usage-based billing could be used to limit competition from online video services like Netflix. He said it could also be used to eliminate competition from smaller third-party ISPs.

"The large ISP-broadcast entities now have a tool for squashing their main competitors — both in internet and video services," said Angus. "We need clear rules that put consumers first."

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission has slowly allowed large service providers like Bell and Rogers to charge internet users who download more than the limit of data for their particular service plan.

For example, in Ontario, Rogers charges customers of its $59.99 a month Hi-Speed Extreme plan who go over their 80 GB a month limit $1.50 per GB for a maximum of $50.

Primus and Shaw have said they will begin passing on higher fees to their customers beginning Feb. 1. Primus, for example, rents bandwidth on Bell's networks and said Bell is inflating the costs for everyone, including companies like it.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

New questions raised about rookie NDP MP

Already panned for her Vegas get-away, newly elected Ruth Ellen Brosseau is facing a new controversy. The issue


More on the new MP: Ruth-Ellen-Brosseau


Brosseau gets spoofed:
Las Vegas-vacationing anglophone Quebec MP gets spoofed on Facebook page


NDP team full of rookies:
The NDP starts new session of Parliament with caucus of students,
rookies and unknowns

What world media thought of our election

Bin Laden may have been the top story, but there was still room for poking fun at Canada. 'Plate of congealed poutine'
What did media outside of Canada think about our election?


Less attention in the U.S.
Amid bin Laden news, Canada's election gets even less U.S. attention than usual

What Harper will change
Five votes Stephen Harper will win with a majority government in Parliament

Youngest MP ever elected
19-year-old sets record as youngest MP; NDPer planned summer job at golf course